Scientific falsification is loosely defined as publishing or reporting misleading facts associated with a study, research or experimentation.

Falsifiability is the assertion that for any hypothesis to have credence, it must be inherently disprovable before it can become accepted as a scientific ...

Scientific misconduct can be considered the willful ignorance of data, evidence of falsifying, skewing of data or deliberate misrepresentation of data.

The history of the scientific method is a fascinating and long one, covering thousands of years of history.

Missing: falsification | Show results with:falsification

There is a well-documented rumor of a scientific referee delaying the work of a rival, to ensure that he received the acclaim and a Nobel award.

"The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation,.

Unsurprisingly, and fittingly, our history of the scientific method will start here, although we must point out that knowledge knows no boundaries.

Falsifiability, as defined by the philosopher, Karl Popper, defines the inherent testability of any scientific hypothesis. Science and philosophy [1] have ...

But in science, there is plenty of doubt. Even the most established theory can later be challenged and falsified as part of the scientific process. Another ...